Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Samuel Groth vs Frederik Sletting-Johnsen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Groth vs Sletting-Johnsen analysis and find out who is favored!
Samuel Groth vs Frederik Sletting-Johnsen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Groth 1 - 0 Sletting-Johnsen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Groth has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sletting-Johnsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Groth, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sletting-Johnsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Groth has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sletting-Johnsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Groth has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sletting-Johnsen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Groth has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 85/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 177). Sletting-Johnsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Groth winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Groth winning 2 and Sletting-Johnsen winning 0. The last match between Groth and Sletting-Johnsen was at the Nottingham Challenger, 01-06-2009, Q1 round, Grass with Samuel Groth getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Groth and Sletting-Johnsen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Groth winning 0 times and Sletting-Johnsen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Groth winning 0, and Sletting-Johnsen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Groth has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sletting-Johnsen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Groth has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sletting-Johnsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Groth has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sletting-Johnsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
53
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
37
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
57% (387-296)
Career Total W/L
25% (11-33)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$650,305
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Groth VS Sletting-Johnsen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Samuel Groth | Frederik Sletting-Johnsen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Groth VS Sletting-Johnsen H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Frederik Sletting-Johnsen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Samuel Groth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
46%
(
12 of
26)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samuel Groth
Player
Manuel Sanchez
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
13
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Groth
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
11%
(
6 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Samuel Groth
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Frederik Sletting-Johnsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Groth Vs Sletting-Johnsen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
